“The storm that we talked about yesterday is doing what we expected it to be doing,” Roys said early Friday. Elsewhere in the city, 5.5 inches fell in Central Park, where the snowfall was expected to taper off by midmorning, AccuWeather meteorologist Tyler Roys told The Post. LaGuardia Airport in Queens tallied 8.4 inches of snow as of 7 a.m., while 5.5 inches were recorded at John F. Power bills sent to McKinney fire victims who lost their homesĪ quick-moving winter storm dumped more than 8 inches of snow on the New York City region early Friday, snarling commutes and causing headaches at area airports, forecasters and officials said. Hurricane Danielle becomes Atlantic Ocean’s first hurricane of the seasonġ-year-old girl killed by massive hailstone during freak storm Fortunately, people who were paying close attention to all the possibilities weren’t caught off guard.Man, it’s a hot one: US feels heat as 26 cities report hottest summers ever - on par with 1936 Dust Bowl New York is experiencing a blizzard that blows away most expectations. Instead, it turns out that the GFS was very wrong this time. It could have easily been right this time, and many New Yorkers probably would have laughed that forecasters had hyped up another storm. Weather buffs might remember that the GFS was one of the models that correctly predicted that last year’s January snow would underperform in New York City. It forecast amounts of less than an inch only a few miles away. The Global Forecast System was on the other end of the spectrum and had only about 3 to 4 inches falling in New York City in its run late Thursday night.
Of course, it could have gone the other way. Still, as I said on Twitter, you simply couldn’t feel too confident of lower snowfall totals in New York City because the NAM was consistent in calling for big snows. Now, the NAM has been known to forecast too much precipitation ( see the aforementioned faux blizzard in New York last year), and it definitely overdid snow amounts north of New York City in this case.
The run late on Thursday evening, which now looks prescient, showed 2 feet of snow falling in New York City. In particular, the North American Mesoscale model showed New York getting hit hard run after run. There were other forecast models suggesting that New York City would get heavy snow. A 50-mile shift in the wrong direction (wrong for this snow-lover, anyway) would have left the city with very little snow, while the same shift in the other direction would have given it what we’re seeing now. As I wrote on Wednesday, New York was right on the edge of heavy snowfall. You might be saying to yourself, that’s a wide range. In this case, the maximum potential looks like it will be closest to the truth. You can see that in its Friday morning briefing: Even though the agency was forecasting 7 to 12 inches at the time, its maps listed a minimum potential of less than an inch and a maximum potential of 23 inches in New York City. The National Weather Service in New York City did a good job expressing the doubt in its forecast through the use of minimum and maximum amounts. 1 It’s the perfect example of why forecasts that vary based on probability are so important, and why outlier predictions should not be dismissed. This weekend, the exact opposite is happening: New York City is getting far more snow than the forecast of 7 to 12 inches from the National Weather Service, which was issued less than 24 hours before the storm hit the city. We saw its perils in January 2015, when meteorologists wiped egg off their faces because New York City didn’t get anywhere near the foot and half or more that was forecast. One of the hardest tasks in weather forecasting is projecting snow totals.
0 kommentar(er)
